Guys I was singing again

2021.10.18 08:31 hpielevators Guys I was singing again

And I couldn’t stop laughing my ass off. I sent it to a friend and at least this time they were nice about it.
submitted by hpielevators to teenagers [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 g4gold Love Bonito

Has anyone tried buying from Love Bonito? Can you share your exp? Are their clothes worth the price? And are the sizes true to size or needs to size up/down?
submitted by g4gold to fashionph [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 SnooApples3402 Video from the first offensive by the NRF from august in Andarab that captured three districts - Taliban are crumbling

submitted by SnooApples3402 to TalibanFootage [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 george-alexander2k Low speeds on Proxmox, 6x SSDs raidz1-0

I am using Proxmox for almost a year and I am very happy with it in every aspect.
A week ago an SSD that had Proxmox installed failed and I had to replace it with one Hard Drive: Hard Disk NAS SEAGATE IronWolf, 2TB, 5900 RPM, SATA3, 64MB, ST2000VN004.
My problem is that I have very low write/read speeds on raidz1-0 formed by:
3 x SSD Samsung 860 QVO 1TB SATA3 2.5 inch
3 x SSD Kingston A400, 960GB, 2.5 inch, SATA III
The ashift is 12, and blocksize is 8k.
I did the fio test and got the following results:
test: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 16.0KiB-16.0KiB, (W) 16.0KiB-16.0KiB, (T) 16.0KiB-16.0KiB, ioengine=psync, iodepth=1
fio-3.25
Starting 1 process
test: Laying out IO file (1 file / 5120MiB)
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)][99.7%][w=52.2MiB/s][w=3340 IOPS][eta 00m:01s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=906084: Mon Oct 18 08:39:08 2021
write: IOPS=1038, BW=16.2MiB/s (17.0MB/s)(5120MiB/315406msec); 0 zone resets
clat (usec): min=3, max=60482, avg=954.61, stdev=653.37
lat (usec): min=3, max=60483, avg=954.87, stdev=653.42
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 7], 5.00th=[ 223], 10.00th=[ 310], 20.00th=[ 453],
| 30.00th=[ 603], 40.00th=[ 750], 50.00th=[ 898], 60.00th=[ 1029],
| 70.00th=[ 1188], 80.00th=[ 1385], 90.00th=[ 1663], 95.00th=[ 1893],
| 99.00th=[ 2278], 99.50th=[ 2573], 99.90th=[ 5866], 99.95th=[ 9241],
| 99.99th=[18220]
bw ( KiB/s): min= 1216, max=88320, per=99.77%, avg=16584.91, stdev=10987.52, samples=630
iops : min= 76, max= 5520, avg=1036.54, stdev=686.72, samples=630
lat (usec) : 4=0.01%, 10=1.49%, 20=0.12%, 50=0.04%, 100=0.02%
lat (usec) : 250=4.75%, 500=16.42%, 750=16.98%, 1000=17.86%
lat (msec) : 2=38.62%, 4=3.50%, 10=0.17%, 20=0.03%, 50=0.01%
lat (msec) : 100=0.01%
cpu : usr=0.99%, sys=12.73%, ctx=311996, majf=0, minf=11
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued rwts: total=0,327680,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: bw=16.2MiB/s (17.0MB/s), 16.2MiB/s-16.2MiB/s (17.0MB/s-17.0MB/s), io=5120MiB (5369MB), run=315406-315406msec
Question: Should I backup/migrate the running VMs and change the config of the pool with different ashift and blocksize?
Zpool status shows no errors.
ZFS Settings:
NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
volume1 type filesystem -
volume1 creation Sat Oct 16 16:56 2021 -
volume1 used 2.55T -
volume1 available 1.50T -
volume1 referenced 153K -
volume1 compressratio 1.00x -
volume1 mounted yes -
volume1 quota none default
volume1 reservation none default
volume1 recordsize 128K default
volume1 mountpoint /volume1 default
volume1 sharenfs off default
volume1 checksum off local
volume1 compression on local
volume1 atime off local
volume1 devices on default
volume1 exec on default
volume1 setuid on default
volume1 readonly off default
volume1 zoned off default
volume1 snapdir hidden default
volume1 aclmode discard default
volume1 aclinherit restricted default
volume1 createtxg 1 -
volume1 canmount on default
volume1 xattr sa local
volume1 copies 1 default
volume1 version 5 -
volume1 utf8only off -
volume1 normalization none -
volume1 casesensitivity sensitive -
volume1 vscan off default
volume1 nbmand off default
volume1 sharesmb off default
volume1 refquota none default
volume1 refreservation none local
volume1 guid 9543726357476160313 -
volume1 primarycache all default
volume1 secondarycache all default
volume1 usedbysnapshots 0B -
volume1 usedbydataset 153K -
volume1 usedbychildren 2.55T -
volume1 usedbyrefreservation 0B -
volume1 logbias latency default
volume1 objsetid 54 -
volume1 dedup off local
volume1 mlslabel none default
volume1 sync disabled local
volume1 dnodesize legacy default
volume1 refcompressratio 1.00x -
volume1 written 153K -
volume1 logicalused 1.51T -
volume1 logicalreferenced 42K -
volume1 volmode default default
volume1 filesystem_limit none default
volume1 snapshot_limit none default
volume1 filesystem_count none default
volume1 snapshot_count none default
volume1 snapdev hidden default
volume1 acltype off default
volume1 context none default
volume1 fscontext none default
volume1 defcontext none default
volume1 rootcontext none default
volume1 relatime off default
volume1 redundant_metadata most local
volume1 overlay on default
volume1 encryption off default
volume1 keylocation none default
volume1 keyformat none default
volume1 pbkdf2iters 0 default
volume1 special_small_blocks 0 default
The results are even worse with another ZFS pool on the same server, which has raid0 of 2 x Seagate IronWolf NAS 8TB, 7200RPM, SATA3, 256MB.
test: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 16.0KiB-16.0KiB, (W) 16.0KiB-16.0KiB, (T) 16.0KiB-16.0KiB, ioengine=psync, iodepth=1
fio-3.25
Starting 1 process
Jobs: 1 (f=1): [w(1)][94.9%][eta 00m:19s]
test: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=2697564: Mon Oct 18 09:28:49 2021
write: IOPS=931, BW=14.6MiB/s (15.3MB/s)(5120MiB/351753msec); 0 zone resets
clat (usec): min=5, max=4730.5k, avg=1068.38, stdev=11442.42
lat (usec): min=5, max=4730.5k, avg=1068.53, stdev=11442.43
clat percentiles (usec):
| 1.00th=[ 8], 5.00th=[ 9], 10.00th=[ 11], 20.00th=[ 34],
| 30.00th=[ 36], 40.00th=[ 38], 50.00th=[ 40], 60.00th=[ 44],
| 70.00th=[ 52], 80.00th=[ 97], 90.00th=[ 2638], 95.00th=[ 7832],
| 99.00th=[ 12256], 99.50th=[ 13304], 99.90th=[ 52167], 99.95th=[139461],
| 99.99th=[396362]
bw ( KiB/s): min= 192, max=376352, per=100.00%, avg=14972.25, stdev=30329.39, samples=691
iops : min= 12, max=23522, avg=935.76, stdev=1895.59, samples=691
lat (usec) : 10=8.94%, 20=4.37%, 50=54.74%, 100=12.09%, 250=8.85%
lat (usec) : 500=0.27%, 750=0.20%, 1000=0.01%
lat (msec) : 2=0.15%, 4=1.37%, 10=6.70%, 20=2.08%, 50=0.14%
lat (msec) : 100=0.05%, 250=0.03%, 500=0.03%, 750=0.01%, >=2000=0.01%
cpu : usr=0.65%, sys=4.18%, ctx=56264, majf=0, minf=15
IO depths : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued rwts: total=0,327680,0,0 short=0,0,0,0 dropped=0,0,0,0
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1
Run status group 0 (all jobs):
WRITE: bw=14.6MiB/s (15.3MB/s), 14.6MiB/s-14.6MiB/s (15.3MB/s-15.3MB/s), io=5120MiB (5369MB), run=351753-351753msec

Would it help if I add another SSD as cache?
I read that if I have an SSD pool, it doesn't help much.

Also, the memory usage is a bit high: 89.97%: 17.57 GiB of 19.53 GiB in Proxmox web interface, and a htop in the VM shows 4.81/19 GB used. Can I use some trick to bring this to a lower value?
submitted by george-alexander2k to ProxmoxVE [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 LiterallyStonkler US TV network ratings dive after prime years of Trump and trauma

US TV network ratings dive after prime years of Trump and trauma submitted by LiterallyStonkler to StonkFeed [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 jkroxxx Had to one up the guy with the Minnesota collection. Go blue!

Had to one up the guy with the Minnesota collection. Go blue! submitted by jkroxxx to basketballcards [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 cielrayze Keqing Impact - I just want to join in making custom icon

Keqing Impact - I just want to join in making custom icon submitted by cielrayze to Genshin_Impact [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 Idiot_mcdingus I am still unsure why I made this

I am still unsure why I made this
https://preview.redd.it/i1e0ckq3l5u71.jpg?width=1536&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bf2a8b9ddf02f8389e7f33b461be2123b9de16eb
https://preview.redd.it/udbmllq2l5u71.png?width=630&format=png&auto=webp&s=14c542dcf589bd4d294c98f6e8bfca10b0c416e2
submitted by Idiot_mcdingus to SMG4 [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 RonTheRatKing It do be sloppy...

It do be sloppy... submitted by RonTheRatKing to HolUp [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 GL1tch3r5 ⇱ CROSSBOW WITH ARROW

submitted by GL1tch3r5 to unicodecirclejerk [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 stoker15524 flag of Belaos

flag of Belaos
https://preview.redd.it/89u0buo5l5u71.png?width=775&format=png&auto=webp&s=cd13f39303d89ccf5faa12e73ee83dbc8e09fb64
submitted by stoker15524 to vexillologycirclejerk [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 RonTheRatKing It do be sloppy...

It do be sloppy... submitted by RonTheRatKing to HolUp [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 epicdude99 Stretched or native?

I’ve been playing stretched and native interchangeably, however I was curious to know what others play. Vote for your preferred resolution! I am aware that stretched has no real effect however it makes me play better and crosshairs are more appealing.
View Poll
submitted by epicdude99 to VALORANT [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 Pal3man [H] Steam Wallet $71 [W] Paypal

Will gift you game with a discount of 15-20% depending on the price of the game Steam Region: Asia Paypal Region: Asia
submitted by Pal3man to SteamGameSwap [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 msmoley Clare Connor, first female president of Marylebone Cricket Club on putting up with sexism and why Lord’s belongs to all

Clare Connor, first female president of Marylebone Cricket Club on putting up with sexism and why Lord’s belongs to all submitted by msmoley to WomenInNews [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 rishabhmishrr r8009940

my aapnana invitation
submitted by rishabhmishrr to AppNana [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 shootonroll Río Rímac

submitted by shootonroll to FIlm [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 toby_plumb_1 Perfect Timing

Perfect Timing submitted by toby_plumb_1 to aww [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 More_Wall_4523 I made this video after friend showed me his EV today….

submitted by More_Wall_4523 to SmallYTChannel [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 ReyhanSerdar Bakan Soylu’nun ‘Korumaya aldık’ dediği ‘Gençliğe Hitabe’ mazgala kapak yapılmış

Bakan Soylu’nun ‘Korumaya aldık’ dediği ‘Gençliğe Hitabe’ mazgala kapak yapılmış submitted by ReyhanSerdar to PolitikTurk [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 candymaster4300 DNA tests: has anyone had one done? What sort of results do they offer?

DNA tests: has anyone had one done? What sort of results do they offer? submitted by candymaster4300 to germanshepherds [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 SuccedTheWholeTiddy I have acquired a legit key, but not sure how to upgrade

I've read the wiki but cannot find instructions how to upgrade to LTSC with my product key
submitted by SuccedTheWholeTiddy to Windows10LTSC [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 Vashudev05 what the hell happened here

what the hell happened here submitted by Vashudev05 to HolUp [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 lss_mobile_mod_03 Hii

hhhjnnyvvyccuvvuvuvuvuvuvucuvuvuvvyvyvuvuvuvuvuvvuvgcvy
submitted by lss_mobile_mod_03 to RedditMobTest [link] [comments]


2021.10.18 08:31 ToddJustWorks Praise Todd Howard

Praise The Legendary Game Developer Todd Howard
submitted by ToddJustWorks to PraiseToddHoward [link] [comments]


http://m-taxi24.ru